Table of contents

Child pages

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election_debates

It was not until 1976 that a second series of televised presidential debates was held during the general election campaign season.

At what depth into their reasoning should a candidate dive?

• Explanation: Suppose you have an idea that you want to persuade the audience of (I'll call it "MI" for "Main Idea"). To do this, you want to supply three supporting statements that, when combined, you think make a persuasive case for the MI. Then suppose that you worry that one of those supporting statements may need support or explanation itself. Should you provide support for that statement immediately? Or should you wait until people ask for support for it?
• Check out "Argument Maps" for a good visual example.
• Example: 

How much time should a person spend talking about their past / track record?

• It may depend on how you do it.

Keep your comments short

• Presidents should really be training for presidential debates the way MMA fighters train for a fight. Bas Rutten trained twice a day.
• Getting interrupted by the moderator doesn't look good.
• Getting interrupted by other candidates also doesn't look good.

Have someone in the audience to give you live feedback

• It might be useful to have something analogous to a cornerman in boxing / MMA

Don't tell complicated stories

Don't reference things that people won't get

Prepare for questions that ask you about things that you aren't familiar with

Don't fumble over your words

Don't have such scripted / complicated answers to questions that you'll end up forgetting things

Particular debates

1960 election

• Kennedy-Nixon First Presidential Debate, 1960

1976 election

• Jimmy Carter - Gerald Ford Presidential Candidates Debate #1 (1976)

1992 election

• 1992.10.15 - 1992 Presidential Debate with George HW Bush, Bill Clinton & Ross Perot

2012 election

Joe Biden is a good debater. A lot of that is probably just because he has been in Congress for so long that he has a really good grasp of the topics.

• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election_debates,_2012#October_11:_Vice_presidential_debate_.28Centre_College.29
• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3roG09O6T4

2016 election

• This is the one that was on CNN, with the Reagan Air Force One in the background.
• The format is a bit messy...candidates are rewarded for butting in, so you end up with a rush of people to try to talk all at the same time.

• My favorites: Rand Paul, Marco Rubio, John Kasich
• John Kasich
  •  
• Rand Paul
  • He comes across as very intelligent.
  • Appearance
    • His hair doesn't look good, it looks greasy.
    • He also has bags under his eyes.
• Jeb Bush
  • I had no idea his wife was Mexican. Honestly that makes him a lot more likable to me, it makes him seem a lot more open-minded.
• Marco Rubio
  • He gave a informed answer about what to think about the situation in Syria, immediately after Trump gave a bad answer.
  • He gave a really good answer about speaking Spanish to potential voters.
  • He was good about not getting interrupted, not speaking too long.
  • I'm getting the sense that he must have practiced a lot.
• Ted Cruz
  • He comes off as really fake.
  • He also also keeps talking.
• Carly Fiorina
  • She had a brilliant response (probably the perfect response) to the moderator's question about Trump's comment about "look at that face".
    • It was short, so she didn't get interrupted, she was able to speak in a clear, calm way.
    • I should really get that quote / video.
• Scott Walker
  • "I'm the only one on this stage that ..."
  • "I want the people at home to know: if I am Commander in Chief, I will ..."
  • "I give you my word, if I'm elected President, ..."
• Mike Huckabee
  • "John Kennedy said we'd put a man on the moon within a decade, why can't we ..."

"What would you do right now to deal with the Syria situation?"

• Trump gave a bad answer, empty of any substance. It was clear he didn't have a grasp on the situation.
• Marco Rubio gave a really, really good answer immediately afterwards.
• It made it clear that the way for Trump's challengers to take him down is to get the debate as specific as possible.