Child pages

Quote:
I tried Beats years ago, before my foray into high-end headphones, and I thought they sounded awesome. Since then, I’ve tried numerous other headphones, but never really hated on Beats. I assumed that people hated Beats just because it was fashionable to do so. I figured they were decent enough quality, but overpriced due to the brand name. However, I recently tried a pair of Beats Studios again, and was shocked to find that I was wrong: they really aren’t very good at all.

Many audiophiles would have you believe Beats are bad because have too much bass. I disagree. It’s that they have too much low quality bass, with even worse mids and treble. If you want to hear what Beats sound like, pull up your equalizer and ram the midbass frequencies up. Hear that loud, boomy, awful noise? That’s what Beats sound like. There’s not nearly enough definition to make the bass sound good, and it drowns out nearly everything else in the music—which is probably okay, because the treble and mids sound like they’re coming from inside a well. The Pro and Executive lines are supposed to be somewhat better than the Studios and Solos (I haven’t tried them myself), but are still far more expensive than they should be.

[...]

Here are a few recommendations for bass-heavy Beats alternatives:

Denon AH-D600 ($268 on Amazon): In my opinion, these are the ultimate Beats alternatives. They’re a little less portable and they don’t have active noise cancellation, but they have some serious, high quality bass slam. It drowns out the mids a tad, but overall the rest of the sound is much clearer and more balanced than Beats’. All that for $30 less than the Beats Studios.

V-Moda Crossfade M-100 ($299 on Amazon, shown above): These are the only headphones on the list that I’ve never heard, but word on the street is they’re the other ultimate Beats replacements—and for around the same price as the Beats Studios. They are much more portable than the Denons, so if that’s important to you, they’re worth looking at.

Audio Technica ATH-M50 ($149 on Amazon): Audio Technica’s insanely popular M50s are not quite as bassy as the others on this list, but still have a but of extra punch in the lower end. Their higher end is also a tad brighter. This would probably be a good headphone if you listen to genres other than just rap or electronic.

Shure SRH750DJ ($149 on Amazon): Not quite as popular as either the above contenders, the SRH750DJ has some really nice bass boost that doesn’t drown out the mids quite as much. Treble suffers slightly, and they aren’t the most comfortable things in the world, but they’re worthy of their small but loyal fanbase.

Ultrasone HFI-580 ($183 on Amazon): Like the M50s, most of the Ultrasone line has a nice bass boost, but the treble tends to be on the brighter side (even brighter than the M50s, in my experience). Check out the 780s ($234 on Amazon) if you’re willing to spend a bit more.

Sennheiser’s Momentum and Urbanite line ($85 and up): Since the original publication of this article, fan-favorite headphone manufacturer Sennheiser came out with two bass-oriented lines that come in different sizes and prices, just like Beats. Both are solid. The Momentums are a bit more balanced, good for bass-loving rock enthusiasts, while the Urbanite line is more of a strict Beats alternative, complete with booming bass for rap and electronic listeners.

[...]

Comment:

Thank you, thank you, thank you for this article!

I am a club DJ of 30 years now (geez...I'm old), which pretty much has seen me go the gamut of dance music from when it was called "Disco" to "EDM." I've always absolutely devoured a deep (and I mean vibrate-your-bones-deep) bass hook. Over the years I've gone through many, many headphones, and some of the best, low-to-midrange (i.e. $50-$150) cans I've heard have come from Sony; the MDR line has always been my go-to for mixing in the club and my studio at home, and I'm using the MDR-V700s for that purpose now.

When the Beats first came out, I gave them a listen and they just sounded like audio mud. The bass was thick and flat, the mids muted like a trumpet through a horn, and the highs sounded like they were being filtered through bales of cotton. In essence, the fidelity sucked. Yet it amazed me how many people bought them 'cause they were more concerned about being "cool" than about the quality of the sound.

It always seemed like such a waste of money.

When I worked in radio (in the mid '80s) we used Sennheiser's in the studio, and they were bright, crisp, and accurate; but I could never afford a pair on my own. To me, they were the best I'd ever heard, until I went to work for Apple, and got a listen to headphones made by Bowers & Wilkins.

The first pair of B&Ws I put on literally made my jaw drop. They were P5's, open air design, with 5" drivers. The sound was simply incredible, and well worth the $299 pricetag. There were also a pair of Harmon Kardon bluetooth (yes, I said "bluetooth") headphones that could be used either wirelessly, or with a wire, which put out equally amazing sound and for $50 less!

Now, these are audiophile brands, priced very, very close to the Beats, with a difference in sound quality that is night-and-day!

I became something of an evangelist. Everytime I would see someone reach for a pair of Beats, I'd encourage them to check out the B&Ws, the HKs, and even the consumer-grade Sennheisers we had in stock. Most times, unless they were adolescents, they'd put the Beats down, and grab one of the other brands. And then they would thank me for not letting them waste $300 dollars on a pair of "crappy" (though most often, the word was somewhat less polite) headphones.

So, again, THANK YOU for this article. It should be required reading for anyone looking to spend more than $100 on a set of cans. My greatest hope is that everyone who reads this, passes it along to as many people as they can, so that Beats can finally be put where they belong — the clearance bin at the Dollar Store.

Noise-cancelling headphones

https://www.quora.com/Is-the-sound-that-noise-cancelling-headphones-produce-dangerous-for-the-ear-hearing

https://ask.metafilter.com/283162/Are-noise-cancelling-headphones-damaging-my-hearing

https://ask.metafilter.com/254710/Adapting-to-noise-cancelling-headphone-headaches-nausea#3700459

https://www.quora.com/Is-there-a-noise-cancelling-headphone-that-can-cancel-human-voice

https://www.quora.com/What-kinds-of-noise-do-noise-canceling-headphones-cancel

https://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/20/technology/personaltech/20askk.html
All this noise-canceling activity may make some people queasy. If you think you might be sensitive to dizziness or other side effects of active noise-reducing headphones, consider instead headphones that use passive noise reduction.

https://www.pointchaser.com/noise-cancelling-headphones-ear-pain/
At first the Bose QuietComfort 35 headphones were amazing: Clear sound, no noise. Then I started to experience some ear pain and other discomforts that kept getting worse.
It all started the first time I used the Bose QuietComfort 35 headphones. After wearing them for a couple of hours, I started to experience sinus pressure, ear discomfort, and pain between my right ear and jaw. I figured it was a symptom of using them for too long and that I would get used to it. When I activated the noise cancelling button, things got worse. The ear pain got more severe and so did the pain close to my jaw. I kept wearing them, thinking this would pass after a few days.
Then my sister, who initially praised her Bose QuietComfort 35 headphones, told me she was experiencing really bad headaches and dizziness. This was after I noticed her being unusually aggravated. She later told me it was the headaches and disorientation from wearing her headphones that put her in a bad mood. We both kept wearing them, thinking it would get better but it only seemed to get worse. In fact, wearing the BoseQuiet Comfort 35 headphones for a while started to make me feel disoriented as well. This was an expected reaction to cancelling out low-frequency sounds. But I decided to Google the problem to see whether this was in fact normal. It turns out lots of people experience headaches, ear pain, dizziness, and disorientation from wearing noise cancelling headphones.

Do noise cancelling headphones make you sick?
http://www.techradar.com/news/audio/portable-audio/do-noise-cancelling-headphones-make-you-sick-230872
"The WSJ also cites Sarah Stackpole, a New York ear, nose and throat doctor, who ‘speculates that the sound waves that cancel each other out may still transmit enough very low frequency vibrations to stimulate the balance receptors that are connected to the hearing hair cells in the inner ear… The disequilibrium that some people may feel from this is made worse because the vibrations falsely signal that the head is moving, but the eyes report that the head is stationary. Those mixed signals make the headphone wearer feel dizzy."

There’s a very good reason not to buy the best noise cancelling headphones in the world
http://www.businessinsider.com/buyer-beware-noise-canceling-headphones-2016-4
The active NC technology creates an odd ear-pressure sensation that feels weird and a bit uncomfortable after extended use, making the experience far less natural than that with a standard set…Don’t get me wrong: I love my QC25s, even if I have to take them off every couple hours to ward off pressure headaches.

Headphones

Table of contents

Child pages

Noise-cancelling headphones