Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Child pages (Children Display)

...

  • Diran Lyons gets only 47,000 views on his YouTube video, but someone on Facebook copies his video and got millions of views.
    •  → 
    • I'm guessing the Facebook accounts that posted the video were more established(?) They had a lot of people already paying attention to them, and so it was easier for them to get the video up-and-going (virally) more quickly.
  • Lindybeige talking about his first viral video
    • He makes a bunch of very interesting observations that I should summarize here.
    • He, like with Diran, had some other sites copy his video on their sites instead of resharing it from YouTube. He said some of the sites edited his video as well. I think I've seen that myself, where a site will remove anything extraneous.




To do

  • I should really, really go through my viral infection simulator and document all of the variables that affect virality.
  • Look for services that'll help get an article to go viral.


Major Ideas:

- the transmission mechanism is absolutely key
- altering the host's behavior is one way to help transmission

Computer viruses are broken into a few different classifications based on the method of transmission:

  • Viruses: A virus is a small piece of software that piggybacks on real programs. For example, a virus might attach itself to a program such as a spreadsheet program. Each time the spreadsheet program runs, the virus runs, too, and it has the chance to reproduce (by attaching to other programs) or wreak havoc.
  • E-mail viruses: An e-mail virus travels as an attachment to e-mail messages, and usually replicates itself by automatically mailing itself to dozens of people in the victim's e-mail address book. Some e-mail viruses don't even require a double-click -- they launch when you view the infected message in the preview pane of your e-mail software [source: Johnson].
  • Trojan horses: A Trojan horse is simply a computer program. The program claims to do one thing (it may claim to be a game) but instead does damage when you run it (it may erase your hard disk). Trojan horses have no way to replicate automatically.
  • Worms: A worm is a small piece of software that uses computer networks and security holes to replicate itself. A copy of the worm scans the network for another machine that has a specific security hole. It copies itself to the new machine using the security hole, and then starts replicating from there, as well.



Sources of Information:

Wikipedia:
General:
Viral Phenomenon

Memes:
Meme
Memetics

Internet:
Viral Marketing

Computer Viruses:
Computer Virus


Books:
The Selfish Gene (1976)
Thought Contagion: How Belief Spreads Through Society

Journals:

Journal of Memetics

People:
Aaron Lynch (author of Thought Contagion and misc journal articles)


2015.01.05 - New Yorker - The Virologist
http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/01/05/virologist

Goffman

...


2012.03.27 - Why Some Ads Go Viral and Others Don't
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ZVTwMUrGEA&feature=plcp
- in the past ads needed to be memorable so they'd have a storyline and then a surprise at the end.
- the problem is that nowadays people skip ads, so they don't arrive at the end of the ad.
- ads nowadays need to capture people in the first 5 seconds; so the surprise needs to come in the first 5 seconds
- after those 5 seconds, providing joy is a good way to keep people. humor actually ISN'T the best way to 
- so actually the best thing to do is to provide joy, then take it away, then provide it again later
- sharing is a function of 2 things:
- 1) content of the ad; surprising is good (more likely to watch), but can't be shocking (less likely to share). EG the budweiser ad w/ naked people is surprising but also shocking; the rollerskating babies commercial is surprising but not shocking
- 2) motivations foster sharing. People share ads because they want to gain social capital, NOT because they're feeling altruistic.


Misc Thoughts:

- i should come up with a very comprehensive version of the zombie infection simulator that lets you play with different methods of infection and different scenarios. For example, right now one zombie can infect one person; what if a person could only be infected if there were more zombies than people in a certain radius of the person? What would that look like?

This is a follow-up to the discussion we were having about whether things like the "ice bucket challenge" can be orchestrated / predicted.

First, I highly recommend you guys check out the book "The Viral Video Manifesto". It talks a lot about why YouTube videos go viral. It was written by guys who orchestrated one of the earliest viral videos. It's a really good book.

After spending 10 minutes looking at past successful challenges I think I see some patterns:

- You want the challenge to be do-able by as many people as possible. Children should be able to do it as well as older people.
- You want the challenge to involve easily-found items, preferably things people will already own.
- You want the challenge to involve a surprising / novel use of those easily-found items.
- You want the challenge to be fun to watch someone take on. This usually means the person performing the challenge experiences some degree of discomfort / embarrassment / danger. But it shouldn't be too painful / dangerous (otherwise people won't try it and the virality suffers).
- You want the challenge to be scalable: people can do it in a less-intense way or more-intense way, depending on their preference.
- You probably don't want to try to get the 'challenge' craze going until a certain amount of time has elapsed from the last 'challenge' craze. The same idea applies in music / movies / videogames.
- There are probably other features that make something successful but I don't feel like spending more time thinking about it right now.

In fact, after thinking about it, I would not be surprised if the people who created the ice-bucket challenge deliberately attempted to mimic the challenges already seen on YouTube.

Anyway, consider these examples:

Partial List of YouTube challenges:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=P ... F436BB687B

Planking
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=planking

The "Tequila Suicide"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qq6iEKVLzWY

Note the similarities:
- It uses things that most people will have easy access to (salt, lemon, tequila)
- It uses those everyday items in a surprising / new way

Differences between this one and the ice-bucket challenge:
- The ice-bucket challenge was for a good cause, which probably helped its virality.
- The tequila suicide used tequila and lemons, which are probably less common than ice and a bucket.
- The tequila suicide was really only do-able by adults (21+), although you might argue that teens could upload vids of themselves doing it.

The Cinnamon Challenge
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_ ... +challenge
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UXkGtJUP0WE

...