a movie is like a dish of food, and filmmaking is like being a cook. there are certain things that seem to make stuff taste better, and there are lots of ingredients that can make something taste different, and so there are tons of possible combinations of the basic ingredients.

for example, salt, fat, and sugar are three basic things that can make a dish of food taste better. the movie-equivalents are probably sex, violence, and comedy. adding a dash of sex and violence may spice up a movie, but add too much and it just becomes ridiculous. the best dishes seem to be the ones that can move you smoothly between different interesting, pleasurable, and new taste experiences, and the best movies seem to be the ones that can take you smoothly between different interesting, new, and emotional experiences.

Star Wars



One of the major restrictions on a film is the speed of human dialogue; that limits how much can happen in a film.



How does it leave you feeling after you watch it?
You could think of this as being analogous to two things with food:
1. The aftertaste (eg smoked salmon leaves a gross smoke aftertaste if I eat too much of it)
2. How the food affects you later on (eg ice cream makes me feel sad the next day)

Example: After watching The Blair Witch Project I was terrified
Example: After watching Amelie I was love-sick for a week
Example: After watching Kill Bill I couldn't remember anything that had happened and felt like I'd just eaten junk food

 

Lindybeige - How to tell if a film is ART

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oCmrcym9Hro

Summary: if you were a film critic interviewing the director, and you asked "What is this film about?", and the only sensible answer is a summary of the plot, then that film is not art.